09 September 2025

เก็บตกวงเสวนา 49 ปี 6 ตุลา:
เมื่อเรื่องราว 6 ตุลาไม่ได้ถูกจำกัดไว้เพียงที่ธรรมศาสตร์
(‘a briefing on the 49th anniversary of 6th Oct.’)


The Two Brothers

เก็บตกวงเสวนา 49 ปี 6 ตุลา: เมื่อเรื่องราว 6 ตุลาไม่ได้ถูกจำกัดไว้เพียงที่ธรรมศาสตร์ (‘a briefing on the 49th anniversary of 6th Oct.: the 6th Oct. event is not limited to Thammasat University’), held today at Thammasat University’s Faculty of Political Science, featured a Q&A with Patporn Phoothong, co-director of the short film The Two Brothers (สองพี่น้อง). The event was a precursor to the upcoming forty-ninth anniversary of the massacre that took place at Thammasat on 6th October 1976.

The Two Brothers was screened as part of today’s event. Directed by Patporn and Teerawat Rujenatham, the documentary features interviews with relatives of two young men who were hanged by police for campaigning against the return of former dictator Thanom Kittikachorn from exile. When student actors at Thammasat staged a reenactment of the hanging, the right-wing Dao Siam (ดาวสยาม) newspaper falsely accused them of hanging an effigy of the Crown Prince (now Rama X), and this inflammatory headline sparked the massacre.


The brutal events of that notorious day are encapsulated in a much-reproduced photograph by Neal Ulevich, which shows a vigilante preparing to beat a hanged corpse with a folding chair. In reference to that image, today’s event included a folding chair on display.

The Two Brothers was previously shown at Hope Space in Bangkok last year, at Thammasat in 2020 and 2017, and at the Thai Film Archive in Salaya in 2017. Thai Cinema Uncensored discusses this and other Thai films that refer to the 1976 massacre.

06 September 2025

The 33rd Bangkok Critics Assembly Awards


The 33rd Bangkok Critics Assembly Awards

In anticipation of the Bangkok Critics Assembly Awards, honouring the best Thai films released last year, the shortlisted feature films will be shown at Century Sukhumvit between 13th and 17th September, followed by Q&A sessions with their respective directors. The nominated films include Taklee Genesis (ตาคลี เจเนซิส) screening on 13th September, Shakespeare Must Die (เชคสเปียร์ต้องตาย) on 14th September, and Breaking the Cycle (อำนาจ ศรัทธา อนาคต) on 16th September.

Taklee Genesis

Taklee Genesis


Chookiat Sakveerakul’s Taklee Genesis features time travel, dinosaurs, kaiju monsters, zombies, cavemen, the Cold War, a dystopian future, and the 6th October 1976 massacre at Thammasat University, all woven together into an ambitious sci-fi epic. (It was shown earlier this year at the Thai Film Archive.)

In a prologue that takes place in May 1992 (an unspoken reference to ‘Black May’), a young girl witnesses “dead bodies falling from the sky.” These are students who died during the Thammasat tragedy, their bodies teleported by the Taklee Genesis device, a time machine that can create alternate realities. As one character says: “Taklee Genesis was used to cover up a massacre.”

When the girl, Stella, grows up, she learns that her father was a CIA agent involved in the development of the Taklee Genesis. One of the project’s test subjects, Lawan, was transformed into a forest-dwelling spirit, like the monkey ghost in Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives (ลุงบุญมีระลึกชาติ), another supernatural personification of the legacy of the Cold War.

Stella and her friend Kong use the Taklee Genesis to travel back in time to Thammasat on 6th October 1976, after Kong discovers that he is one of the massacre victims who fell from the sky. Chookiat recreates the violence of that day, showing Red Gaur militiamen gunning down students. A young boy stands alone on a balcony laughing at the carnage, in a reference to a smiling onlooker in a photograph by Neal Ulevich. (The artist Khai Maew created a model of the child, which he called Happy Boy.)

Thanks to the Taklee Genesis, Kong has the chance to fight back against the vigilantes who have stormed the campus. This fantasy scenario, in which a Thammasat victim is given the agency to tackle his potential killers, is similar to the alternate history narrative in Preecha Raksorn’s comic strip Once Upon a Time at..., in which the victim in Ulevich’s photograph escapes from his assailant.

Discussion of the Thammasat massacre was suppressed for years, not by the fictional Taklee Genesis device, but instead by successive military governments. Today, it’s primarily through photographs of the event, particularly the famous image by Ulevich, that the incident is remembered. In one of the film’s most powerful moments, Kong takes a roll of film from the camera of his Thammasat classmate and gives it to Stella, telling her: “Make sure we’re not forgotten.”

The Thammasat massacre is a notorious incident in Thailand’s modern history, though it has rarely been represented on screen. The 6th October scenes in Taklee Genesis are almost unprecedented: the only previous attempt to dramatise the brutality of the event was in the horror film Haunted Universities (มหาลัยสยองขวัญ), which was cut by the Thai film censors.

Shakespeare Must Die

Shakespeare Must Die


Shakespeare Must Die, directed by Ing K., is a Thai adaptation of William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, with Pisarn Pattanapeeradej in the lead role. The play is presented in two parallel versions: a production in period costume, and a contemporary political interpretation. The period version is faithful to Shakespeare’s original, though it also breaks the fourth wall, with cutaways to the audience and an interval outside the theatre (featuring a cameo by the director).

In the contemporary sequences, Macbeth is reimagined as Mekhdeth, a prime minister facing a crisis. Street protesters shout “ok pbai!” (‘get out!’), and the protests are infiltrated by assassins listed in the credits as ‘men in black’. Ing has downplayed any direct link to Thai politics, though “Thaksin ok pbai!” was the People’s Alliance for Democracy’s rallying cry against Thaksin Shinawatra, and ‘men in black’ were blamed for instigating violence in 2010. Another satirical line in the script — “Dear Leader brings happy-ocracy!” — predicts Prayut Chan-o-cha’s propaganda song Returning Happiness to the Thai Kingdom (คืนความสุขให้ประเทศไทย).

The parallels between Mekhdeth and Thaksin highlight the politically-motivated nature of the ban imposed on the film in 2012. Ironically, the project was initially funded by the Ministry of Culture, during Abhisit Vejjajiva’s premiership: it received a grant from the ไทยเข้มแข็ง (‘strong Thailand’) stimulus package. The Abhisit government was only too happy to greenlight a script criticising Thaksin, though by the time the film was finished, Thaksin’s sister Yingluck was in power, and her administration was somewhat less disposed to this anti-Thaksin satire, hence the ban.

The film’s climax, a recreation of the Thammasat massacre, is its most controversial sequence. A photograph by Neal Ulevich, taken during the massacre, shows a vigilante preparing to hit a corpse with a chair, and Shakespeare Must Die restages the incident. A hanging body (symbolising Shakespeare himself) is repeatedly hit with a chair, though rather than dwelling on the violence, Ing cuts to reaction shots of the crowd, which (as in 1976) resembles a baying mob.

When I interviewed her for Thai Cinema Uncensored, Ing didn’t mince her words, describing the censors as “a bunch of trembling morons with the power of life and death over our films.” Thai Cinema Uncensored also includes an insider’s account from a member of the appeals committee, who said he was obliged by his department head to vote against releasing the film: “I had to vote no, because it was an instruction from my director. But if I could have voted freely, I would have voted yes.”

The ban on Shakespeare Must Die was finally lifted by the Supreme Court last year, and its theatrical release came a few months later. It has since been shown at Burapha University and Chiang Mai University, and its most recent screening was at the Phimailongweek (พิมายฬองวีค) experimental arts festival in Korat.

Breaking the Cycle

Breaking the Cycle


Breaking the Cycle, directed by Aekaphong Saransate and Thanakrit Duangmaneeporn, is a fly-on-the-wall account of the Future Forward party, which was dissolved by the Constitutional Court in 2020. (Future Forward was founded as a progressive alternative to military dictatorship. The party came third in the 2019 election, after a wave of support for its charismatic leader, Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, though he was disqualified as an MP by the Constitutional Court.)

The film begins in 2014 with Thanathorn’s determination to end the vicious cycle of military coups that has characterised Thailand’s modern political history. This mission gives the film its title, and Future Forward co-founder Piyabutr Saengkanokkul asks: “Why is Thailand stuck in this cycle of coups?” The documentary benefits from its extensive access to every senior figure within Future Forward. The directors were even able to film Thanathorn as he reacted to the guilty verdicts being delivered by the Constitutional Court.

The documentary ends with the caption “THE CYCLE CONTINUES”, which is sadly accurate: Future Forward’s successor, Move Forward, was dissolved by the Constitutional Court last year despite winning the 2023 election. The movement’s third incarnation, the People’s Party, endorsed Anutin Charnvirakul as Prime Minister this week, on the condition that he agreed to call a new election within four months.

Breaking the Cycle went on general release last year. It was later shown at the Thai Film Archive, as part of the Lost and Longing (แด่วันคืนที่สูญหาย) season. It was also screened at A.E.Y. Space in Songkla, and at the Bangsaen Film Festival at Burapha University. It was part of the Hits Me Movies... One More Time programme at House Samyan in Bangkok, and earlier this year it was screened at Thammasat University and Chulalongkorn University.

05 September 2025

Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul


Democracy Monument

Anutin Charnvirakul, leader of Bhumjaithai, became Thai Prime Minister today, though his term in office may be short-lived. After the Constitutional Court dismissed Paetongtarn Shinawatra last week, Anutin was the clear front-runner to succeed her, and he has now been elected by a majority of MPs, though he will lead a minority caretaker government.

Bhumjaithai was the first party to join Pheu Thai’s coalition in 2023, after Pheu Thai abandoned the election winners, Move Forward. Anutin became interior minister in the coalition government, though earlier this year there were rumours that he would lose that powerful position in a cabinet reshuffle. When Paetongtarn’s obsequious phone call with former Cambodian PM Hun Sen was leaked, Anutin used the scandal as a pretext to withdraw Bhumjaithai from the coalition.

To win today’s parliamentary vote, Anutin relied on the support of the opposition People’s Party, which was founded after Move Forward was dissolved by the Constitutional Court. The People’s Party and Bhumjaithai signed a joint agreement on 3rd September, with the People’s Party endorsing Anutin as PM (though not joining a Bhumjaithai coalition) on the condition that he pledged to call an election within four months.

This confidence-and-supply arrangement is extremely unconventional, as the progressive People’s Party and the conservative Bhumjaithai are ideological opposites. But it’s in the People’s Party’s interests to hold an election as soon as possible, as Pheu Thai, their main rival, have lost public confidence. Perhaps, as the proverb says, my enemy’s enemy is my friend — the People’s Party and Bhumjaithai are united only in their mutual distrust of Pheu Thai — though the deal with Anutin could also cost the People’s Party some support at the next election.

In a last-minute and rather desperate overture yesterday, Pheu Thai offered to dissolve parliament immediately — not within the four months agreed by Anutin — provided that the People’s Party endorsed Pheu Thai’s candidate Chaikasem Nitisiri as PM. The People’s Party rejected this proposal and instead voted for Anutin, but only after an intense internal debate.

With only two nominated candidates, Anutin and Chaikasem, the People’s Party were caught between a rock and a hard place: vote for the party that scuppered their chances of forming a government in 2023 (Pheu Thai), or a party that opposes their entire manifesto (Bhumjaithai). In the end, given the betrayal that took place after the last election, it seems that the People’s Party leadership couldn’t bring themselves to endorse a Pheu Thai candidate. (If they had abstained, and neither candidate had gained a majority, this would have led to a second round of voting, with different candidates, potentially including Prayut Chan-o-cha.)

Phumtham Wechayachai, who had served as acting prime minister since Paetongtarn’s suspension in July, submitted a draft royal decree seeking the dissolution of parliament on 2nd September, to be signed by the King. But the submission was swiftly rejected by the Privy Council, citing legal advice that an acting PM is not authorised to dissolve parliament.

31 August 2025

A Useful Ghost


A Useful Ghost

[This review contains spoilers.]

A young woman dies, and returns as a ghost to reunite with her husband. This Thai legend, the story of Mae Nak, has been retold dozens of times, including in the blockbuster Pee Mak (พี่มาก .. พระโขนง) starring Davika Hoorne. (I wrote about the various Mae Nak adaptations for Encounter Thailand magazine.)

Davika also stars in A Useful Ghost (ผีใช้ได้ค่ะ), though there’s a bizarre twist to the tale: she plays Nat, a ghost that returns to her husband March not as a traditional spectre, but as a haunted vacuum cleaner. (The names Nat and March evoke those of Mae Nak and her husband Mak.)

In A Useful Ghost, the spirits of the dead possess electrical appliances, either to be near their loved ones or, in most cases, to torment the people responsible for their deaths. Inhaling toxic dust particles seems to be a common cause of death, hence the possessed vacuums, and this is a reflection of real life: Bangkok and Chiang Mai are notorious for their air pollution.

A Useful Ghost

Ratchapoom Boonbunchachoke’s film begins as an absurd comedy, as the haunted Hoover trundles around. (A Useful Ghost shares its sense of deadpan humour with the short films of Sorayos Prapapan.) In a hilarious early sequence, a monk insults Nat’s ghost, prompting a debate among his fellow monks: “Sir, we’re holy men. We shouldn’t use words like ‘cunt’ too liberally.”

In its second half, A Useful Ghost becomes much darker. We discover that some appliances are haunted by victims of political violence: Dr Paul, a government minister, complains that he can’t sleep due to the sounds of gunshots replayed by the ghosts of those who died at Ratchaprasong in 2010. It’s this noise, not his conscience, keeping him awake at night.

Dr Paul leads a decadent lifestyle, and seems to have authority everywhere he goes, yet his ministerial portfolio is unspecified. This ambiguity, and his generic name, are presumably intended to avoid any association with real-life politicians. His wife complains about protesters who revive memories of the 1976 Thammasat massacre and the 1932 revolution, and a subplot about the dismantling of a frieze also refers to the removal of monuments commemorating 1932.

The film shifts in tone from comedy to political satire, as Nat taps into people’s dreams and the state uses electroconvulsive therapy to erase the memories of the ghosts’ living relatives. (If people can’t remember the deceased in their dreams, then the ghosts will disappear.) The ECT not only eliminates the ghosts, it also ensures that any memories of state atrocities are erased, and March resists this brainwashing by reading a (fictional) book about Ratchaprasong. As he tells Nat, she is helping to delete history, so he is trying to preserve it.

A Useful Ghost

The forgetting of political violence is also a key theme in the sci-fi film Taklee Genesis (ตาคลี เจเนซิส), the short film Transmissions of Unwanted Pasts (วงโคจรของความทรงจำ), and the video installation Delete Our History, Now! (อำนาจ/การลบทิ้ง). There are three short films featuring the ghosts of Ratchaprasong massacre victims: We Will Forget It Again (แล้วเราจะลืมมันอีกครั้ง) — which also deals with the theme of forgetting the past — This House Have Ghost [sic], and Hush, Tonight the Dead Are Dreaming Loudly (as discussed in Thai Cinema Uncensored).

As in Ten Years Thailand and Supernatural (เหนือธรรมชาติ), A Useful Ghost uses dystopian science-fiction to comment on present-day Thailand. Like the film’s scientists wiping memories, successive military governments have sought to suppress discussion of controversial events. The result of this whitewashing is a cycle of nascent democratic reforms repeatedly reset by military coups, as forgotten history is destined to repeat itself.

A Useful Ghost’s initial focus on dust particles and vacuum cleaners is given an additional resonance in its second half. In Thailand, the idiom ‘dust under the feet’ refers to people swept under the carpet like specks of dust to be vacuumed up. The film’s cathartic ending hints at this metaphorical meaning of ‘dust’, as the ghosts wreak their revenge on Dr Paul while dust particles are shown glittering in the air.

30 August 2025

Constitutional Court:
“Her actions have led to a loss of trust…”



The Constitutional Court has ruled that Paetongtarn Shinawatra must be dismissed as Prime Minister, after finding her guilty of unethical conduct. The 6–3 majority verdict came after an investigation into a telephone call between Paetongtarn and former Cambodian PM Hun Sen, in which she appeared to side with Cambodia against her own military.

The phone call took place on 15th June, and the Cambodian government released a recording of it online a few days later, to embarrass Paetongtarn at a time of rising tensions between the two countries. During the conversation, Paetongtarn criticised Boonsin Padklang, a regional military commander: “As for the opposition to the Thai government, such as the 2nd Army Region commander, he could say anything that doesn’t benefit the country — anything just to make himself look cool”.

There is an active border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia, and Boonsin commands troops in Thailand’s northeastern region, which includes the Thai–Cambodia border. In the phone call, Paetongtarn also seemed to accept Cambodia’s conditions to resolve the conflict, putting her under pressure from nationalists who protested that the Shinawatra family was putting its personal relationship with Hun Sen before the country’s national security.

This was echoed by yesterday’s verdict. In its judgement, the court said: “Her actions have led to a loss of trust, prioritising personal interest over national interest, which fuelled public suspicion that she was siding with Cambodia and diminished confidence in her as PM among Thai citizens... The defendant has not upheld the ethical code of conduct.”

Anutin Charnvirakul — now a leading candidate to replace Paetongtarn as PM — used the controversy as a pretext to withdraw his Bhumjaithai party from the coalition government, and thirty-six senators petitioned the Constitutional Court, accusing her of breaching ethical standards. She had been suspended as PM for the past two months, during the court’s investigation.

Paetongtarn is the daughter of Thaksin Shinawatra, who has maintained an outsized influence over Thai politics for the past twenty years despite being deposed by the 2006 coup. She is also the fifth PM to have been hand-picked by Thaksin, after Srettha Thavisin, Yingluck Shinawatra, Samak Sundaravej, and Somchai Wongsawat. Coincidentally — or not — all five have been dismissed by the Constitutional Court.

29 August 2025

SWU Through Poster
Thailand Postlitical Fiction


SWU Through Poster

After its launch in Bangkok last year, and subsequent events in Khon Kaen and Phayao earlier this year, the Thailand Postlitical Fiction exhibition will take place at Srinakharinwiwot University from today until 2nd September. (The exhibition’s dates were originally advertised as 1st–5th September.) SWU Through Poster features poster designs for imaginary movies commenting on Thai politics, including some new submissions.

2553 Who Put That Bullet In Their Hand?

Marisa Nagaoka’s poster 2553 shows a red chess piece defeated by a yellow one, symbolising the massacre of red-shirt protesters in 2010. (2553 in the Buddhist Era calendar is equivalent to 2010.) Natcha Threekul’s poster Who Put That Bullet In Their Hand? superimposes a large bullet over a photograph of the 6th October 1976 massacre at Thammasat University. Both posters address the issue of who is culpable for the violence committed.

28 August 2025

Thai Film Archive


Tears of the Black Tiger

The Thai Film Archive in Salaya shows a continuous programme of classic films, though over the next two months there will be some especially remarkable screenings. September and October’s highlights include several of the most important Thai films of all time, and classics of world cinema.

There will be a chance to see a selection of films on the national heritage register. (Each year since 2011, titles have been added to a list films of artistic or historical significance, with new additions announced each 4th October.) These range from the documentary การปฏิบัติหน้าที่เพื่อประเทศชาติในตำแหน่งหัวหน้ารัฐบาลและผู้นำทางทหาร จนถึงล้มป่วยและอสัญกรรมของ ฯพณฯ จอมพลสฤษดิ์ ธนะรัชต์ (‘Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat performing duties for the country as the head of government and military leader until his illness and death’) on 19th September, to Somboonsuk Niyomsiri’s all-time classic A Man Called Tone (โทน) on 2nd and 27th September.


Sarit Thanarat


The Sarit newsreel, previously screened at the Borderless Film Festival (เทศกาลภาพยนตร์ไร้พรมแดน) in Khon Kaen, is a fascinating example of Cold War state propaganda. At the time of its original release, it would have provided a counter-narrative to the exposés of the dictator’s decadence and corruption that were rushed into print after his death. The film depicts Sarit as a PM dedicated to his people, especially in Isan, where he is seen working to alleviate poverty. He is portrayed as a tireless leader, to the extent that he became ill through overwork, and the film ends with scenes of national mourning following his state funeral.

A Man Called Tone

A Man Called Tone


The release of A Man Called Tone in 1970 was a turning point in Thai cinema history. Filmed in widescreen 35mm, it marked the end of the 16mm era, a formulaic mode of production that had dominated the industry for the previous twenty years. Stylistically, its modern approach to characterisation, acting, narrative, music, and cinematography was equally groundbreaking. It was last shown in 2023, to mark Somboonsuk’s ninetieth birthday, and was previously screened in 2022 at Doc Club and Pub in Bangkok, though a gala screening at the Scala cinema in 2020 was cancelled due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Monrak Luk Thung

Monrak Luk Thung


If A Man Called Tone signalled the birth of modern Thai cinema, the blockbuster musical Monrak Luk Thung (มนต์รักลูกทุ่ง) marked the end of the golden age. Starring Mitr Chaibancha and Petchara Chaowarat, Thai cinema’s greatest stars, and released in 1970 — the same year as A Man Called Tone — it was an unprecedented box-office success. It will be shown at the Film Archive on 1st and 24th October, as part of The Influencer, a season of films starring Mitr and inspired by him.

The Influencer also includes two films by Wisit Sasanatieng: Tears of the Black Tiger (ฟ้าทะลายโจร) and The Red Eagle (อินทรีแดง). Tears of the Black Tiger, a tribute to Mitr’s era of filmmaking, is screening on 11th and 21st October. The Red Eagle, a direct remake of Mitr’s final film, will be shown on 14th and 29th October. (Both films were previously shown by the Film Archive at Wisit retrospectives in 2021 and 2010.)

Tears of the Black Tiger

Tears of the Black Tiger


Tears of the Black Tiger, Wisit’s directorial debut, became a cult classic due to its uniquely over-saturated colour palette, its ‘spaghetti western’-style violence, and its lakorn-style melodrama. Celebrating its twenty-fifth anniversary this year, it’s one of the greatest Thai films ever made. It has been shown quite frequently over the years: in Chiang Mai in 2022, at Alliance Française in 2020, at Bangkok Screening Room in 2017, at Thailand Creative and Design Center in 2016, at Bangkok Art and Culture Centre in 2012, and at the Film Archive in 2013 and 2009.

The Red Eagle

The Red Eagle


The Red Eagle stars Ananda Everingham (who I interviewed in 2013) as the masked superhero originally played by Mitr, but in this updated version, the Red Eagle is as much a criminal as a hero. Like Iron Man, he is dependent on pain-relieving medication; like Batman in The Dark Knight, he rides a gleaming black motorbike; like both of them, he has no superpowers.

Political corruption is a major theme, and scenes in which the Thai PM’s car is surrounded by protesters are a reminder of the 2009 Songkran demonstrations in Bangkok. In fact, The Red Eagle is one of the few films to feature a prime minister as a character, in this case one who abandons his principles once he assumes office, reneging on a pre-election pledge to ban nuclear power.

Censor Must Die

Censor Must Die


Another Film Archive season, Woman with a Movie Camera, pays tribute to leading female directors and includes screenings of Ing K.’s Censor Must Die (เซ็นเซอร์ต้องตาย) on 8th and 28th October. The documentary follows producer Manit Sriwanichpoom as he appeals against the Ministry of Culture’s decision to ban Shakespeare Must Die (เชคสเปียร์ต้องตาย) and files a case with the Office of the National Human Rights Commission. (After more than a decade, the ban was finally revoked by the Supreme Court last year.)

Censor Must Die’s most revealing scene takes place at the headquarters of the Ministry of Culture: in the lobby, a TV plays a video demonstrating the traditional Thai method of sitting in a polite and respectful manner. The video encapsulates the Ministry’s didactic and outdated interpretation of Thai culture, and it was parodied by the mock instructional video “How to Behave Elegantly Like a Thai” in Sorayos Prapapan’s film Arnold Is a Model Student (อานนเป็นนักเรียนตัวอย่าง).

The documentary premiered at the Freedom on Film (สิทธิหนังไทย) seminar in 2013. It was shown a few months later at the Film Archive, and had private screenings at Silpakorn University and the Friese-Greene Club. After screenings in May and July last year, it is now showing on regular rotation at Cinema Oasis, the cinema Ing and Manit founded in Bangkok.

La haine

La haine
(‘hate’)


Finally, the French classic La haine (‘hate’), directed by Mathieu Kassovitz, will be shown at the Film Archive on 18th and 28th September. La haine, an explosive film exposing racial tensions in banlieue ghettos outside Paris, was also screened earlier this year at House Samyan in Bangkok, to mark its thirtieth anniversary.

23 August 2025

Isan Odyssey


Isan Odyssey

Thunska Pansittivorakul’s new documentary Isan Odyssey (อีสานอำพราง) had its premiere yesterday, as the opening film of the What the Doc! (เทศกาลภาพยนตร์ สารคดีนานาชาติ แห่งประเทศไทย) film festival. Thunska took part in a Q&A after the film, at House Samyan in Bangkok, and there will be another screening and Q&A at Century Sukhumvit in Bangkok on 3rd September.

Phassarawin Kulsomboon, Isan Odyssey’s cinematographer, previously directed Khon Boys (เด็กโขน), a documentary about a troupe of young khon dancers, and Isan Odyssey begins in a similar vein, following a troupe of young mor lam performers. Just as Khon Boys covers the historical restrictions imposed on khon performances, Isan Odyssey links the past suppression of mor lam to the political history of Thailand.

Isan Odyssey highlights the origins of mor lam as a form of political expression in the Isan region. Modern mor lam, in contrast, is primarily a commercial entertainment: “Gone are the days of ideology and fighting against state injustice.”

Isan Odyssey

The veteran leader of the mor lam troupe recalls his youth in the 1960s, when he heard shots fired from helicopters, the sound of “Thai soldiers shooting communists”. This provides a segue to the film’s central theme: the state’s anti-communist campaign in various Isan provinces during the Cold War.

A voiceover describes how suspected communists were “brutally murdered” during Sarit Thanarat’s regime, and how this “ruthless suppression” continued during the Thanom Kittikachorn era. An elderly resident of the village of Nabua describes the situation at that time as “suffocatingly brutal.”

Similarly, Apichatpong Weerasethakul has made several films in and around Nabua, whose inhabitants were among the first victims of the anti-communist purge. In Apichatpong’s short film A Letter to Uncle Boonmee (จดหมายถงลงบญม), a narrator recalls the area’s past: “Soldiers once occupied this place. They killed and tortured the villagers and forced them to flee to the jungle.”

Isan Odyssey

Isan Odyssey touches on three specific historical incidents, though only briefly. It includes 16mm newsreel footage from 14th October 1973, and a few photographs from 6th October 1976. A young photographer describes the military crackdown in May 2010, and a caption informs us that this resulted in 108 casualties. This grim statistic was a bone of contention in Nontawat Numbenchapol’s documentary Boundary (ฟ้าต่ำแผ่นดินสูง), which was banned in part because it claimed that around 100 people had died.

One of Thunska’s films, This Area Is Under Quarantine (บริเวณนี้อยู่ภายใต้การกักกัน), was also banned. As a result, he told me in an interview for Thai Cinema Uncensored: “I decided not to show any of my films in Thailand.” Working with German producer Jürgen Brüning, he made nine films — The Terrorists (ผู้ก่อการร้าย), Supernatural (เหนือธรรมชาติ), sPACEtIME (กาล-อวกาศ), Reincarnate (จุติ), Homogeneous, Empty Time (สุญกาล), Santikhiri Sonata (สันติคีรี โซนาตา), Avalon (แดนศักดิ์สิทธิ์), Danse Macabre (มรณสติ), and Damnatio Memoriae (ไม่พึงปรารถนา) — all of which featured sexually explicit and politically sensitive content, and none of which had theatrical releases in Thailand.

Isan Odyssey is an exception: it was produced by Documentary Club in Thailand, rather than by Brüning in Germany, and it will go on theatrical release here on 25th September. As in Thunska’s other work, Isan Odyssey directly criticises the Thai state, though it avoids the graphic imagery of his earlier films, hence its ‘15’ rating from the Thai film censorship board.

22 August 2025

Thaksin Shinawatra:
“The case was dismissed...”


Chosun Media

Charges of lèse-majesté and violation of the Computer Crime Act against former PM Thaksin Shinawatra — the single most influential figure in Thai politics over the past two decades — were dismissed by the Criminal Court in Bangkok this morning. The charges related to a video interview that Thaksin gave in South Korea ten years ago: speaking to The Chosun Daily (조선일보), he implied that a “palace circle” was behind the 2014 coup.


Today, the court ruled that Thaksin’s interview did not constitute lèse-majesté, as he had not singled out any specific individual for criticism. The verdict followed the letter of the lèse-majesté law, and the court did not detect any possible innuendo in Thaksin’s vague references to palace insiders. This is how the law should be applied, of course, though it’s in contrast to lèse-majesté cases involving less high-profile defendants, in which the law has been interpreted more broadly.

Thaksin’s passports were revoked by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 2015, in a preemptive decision pending a police investigation into the Chosun Daily video. Two days later, lèse-majesté charges were filed against him on behalf of Udomdej Sitabutr, army chief at the time (raising questions about the politicisation of the military). The case lay dormant for almost a decade, though it was reopened last year, following Thaksin’s return from self-imposed exile. He appeared at the Office of the Attorney General to answer the charges, and was then formally indicted. The long-running case has now been dropped.

21 August 2025

Deaw 12


Deaw 12

Popular comedian Udom Taephanich reported to police in Kanchanaburi yesterday after a defamation suit was filed against him by Preecha Kraikruan. Preecha hit the headlines in 2017 after falsely claiming that he had won the lottery, and Udom joked about this in his twelfth stand-up comedy show, filmed in 2018.

The show — Deaw 12 (เดี่ยว 12) — was released on DVD and is streaming on Netflix. Preecha apparently only recently realised that he was the butt of Udom’s jokes, hence his libel lawsuit filed seven years after the show was recorded. In a satirical song (part of the encore, which is not included in the YouTube video of the show), Udom rapped:

“Preecha claimed the lottery was his...
It’s easier to tell lies
Than admit the truth”.


This is the third legal case against Udom. Last year, he faced lèse-majesté charges after a routine about the ‘sufficiency economy’ in his Netflix special Super Soft Power (ซูเปอร์ซอฟต์พาวเวอร์). (In that show, he didn’t challenge the notion of sufficiency economy itself; instead, he criticised the hypocrisy of influencers who falsely claim to adhere to sufficiency economy principles.)

In 2022, he was accused of endangering national security following his mildly satirical riff about military leaders Prayut Chan-o-cha and Prawit Wongsuwan. (Comparing them to unqualified pilots, he suggested that they should resign: “both of you, the pilot and copilot, please eject yourselves from the plane.”)