
In a 2019 interview with the Electric Literature website, Veeraporn explained how the novel had been directly inspired by Ratchaprasong: “I was overcome with a deep, painful bitterness seeing the fashionable, well-educated, well-paid people of the city feeling content about the injuries inflicted upon the poorer, less educated people who were mostly from the upcountry. And it was important to write about that bitterness.” This situates the novel within a movement that Sayan Daenklom called “Post-Ratchaprasong art”, in the journal Read (อ่าน; vol. 3, no. 2).
The novel has an intentionally melodramatic narrative, in a parody of Thai lakorn (soap operas), particularly Club Friday (คลับฟรายเดย์เดอะซีรีส์). In the Electric Literature interview, Veeraporn linked the repetitive nature of soap plotlines to the vicious cycle of Thai politics: “they have the same old toxic storylines that keep repeating themselves, which is also very similar to how the general public keeps becoming involved with politics in the streets of Thailand.” (Sanchai Chotirosseranee’s short film The Love Culprit makes the same point, comparing lakorn remakes to the cycle of Thai coups.)


Silence and 6th October 1976 are also central to Atibhop Pataradetpisan’s novel from 2012, ประวัติศาสตร์ของความเงียบ (‘the history of silence’). Atibhop’s book is one of several novels written in the years after the 2010 massacre that draw parallels between 1976 and 2010: others include โปรดจงโอบกอดฉันไว้ (‘please embrace me’) by Preedee Hongsaton (also from 2012), อนุสรณ์สถาน (‘memorial’) by Veerapong Soontornchattrawat (2013), หลงลบลืมสูญ (‘lost, forgotten’) by Wipas Srithong (2015), ดังนั้นจึงสิ้นสลาย (‘thus it is destroyed’) by Nithi Nithiverakul (also 2015), and เนรเทศ by Phu Kradat.



