

Trump sued the Mail over an article it published on 20th August last year, headlined "Racy photos and troubling questions about his wife's past that could derail Trump". The article, written by Natalie Clarke, discussed allegations that Trump's former modelling agency had provided escort services, and suggested that Trump had worked as an escort. The Mail quoted the owner of the modelling agency denying the story, though this was overshadowed by the insinuations in the headline.
After Trump filed her lawsuit, the Mail went to unusual lengths to remove all traces of the article online, including having it deleted from Google's cache and the PressReader digital archive. The Mail also printed a lengthy response to the lawsuit on 2nd September last year, though this repeated the claims in the process of retracting them: "To the extent that anything in our article was interpreted as stating or suggesting that Mrs Trump worked as an 'escort' or in the 'sex business'... it is hereby retracted, and we regret any such misinterpretation."
Following the settlement of the case yesterday, the Mail printed an apology on page nine of today's paper. This time, it did not repeat the claims, instead referring euphemistically to "allegations that she provided services beyond simply modelling." The statement also included an unequivocal retraction and apology: "We accept that these allegations about Mrs Trump are not true and we retract and withdraw them. We apologise to Mrs Trump for any distress that our publication caused her."
0 comment(s):
Post a comment